Development Hell, thy name is RoboCop — no longer! After years of tentative hype, a TV series based on the original 1987 film is reportedly moving forward at Amazon’s Prime Video. Details are still vague, with everything from the intended showrunner to cast and crew as yet unknown.
Considering that the original RoboCop is a far-from-subtle indictment of a corporate-led monoculture, it could be said that the new Amazon-backed series transcends self-satire by its mere existence. Still, this might not come as a huge surprise to anyone who remembers the merchandising juggernaut of the original film, rife with gun-toting super-cop action figures, comparatively weak sequels, and not one but two animated series. Despite this, RoboCop remains a surprisingly thoughtful examination of a whole slew of societal ills. If Amazon’s reboot is going to succeed, there are a few things the new show’s creative team needs to keep in mind.
5
The body horror
Let’s face it, RoboCop is not for the faint of heart. Far from a thoughtless 1980s shoot-’em-up action flick, director Paul Verhoeven went out of his way to show the real and devastating personal cost for Alex Murphy (Peter Weller). As the victim of violent crime, he is pulled back from the brink of death and encased in a tomb-like control suit. As his memory flickers in and out and his bodily autonomy ebbs, Alex’s inner torment is deeply unsettling. Without that grisly body horror, the impact of his transformation into RoboCop would be muted, so here’s hoping the TV series leans all the way in.
4
The RoboCop armor
The practical effects of the original RoboCop are legendary, with elaborate death scenes and a heavy, clunky suit made out of polyurethane and fiberglass giving our antihero an unforgettable look. In the world of VFX, it’s now possible to almost entirely skip the endless months spent assembling the original RoboCop design, but there has to be a happy medium between making our next RoboCop wear an inflexible tank every day and casting us into total VFX unreality. The horror of RoboCop is the reality of it — if we don’t believe that there’s a broken man trapped in that trigger-happy murder suit, this whole series falls apart before it even begins.
3
The surveillance state
With the well-documented rise in things like AI warfare, mass surveillance, and police brutality over the last several years, this iteration of RoboCop is going to have its job cut out for it saying something beyond simply reiterating 2026 headlines. After all, many of RoboCop’s 1987 predictions have come disturbingly true in some notable ways, with greedy corporate overlords destroying social safety nets in order to offer incentivized, privatized alternatives ringing unfortunately quite true in the modern era. The same oligarchs pushing untested, unproven tech with the goal of replacing human beings with a mechanical workforce also unfortunately does not sound much like science “fiction” these days, either.
2
Don’t forget, it’s funny
Maybe the most underappreciated element of the original film is that Verhoeven loves a good yuk. Much of the violence in the film is exaggerated to the point of absurdity, because the creative team simply thought it made the film funnier. Forget the political allegory; it might be more important that the showrunner commits to having as much fun as Verhoeven did while making the original.
1
The moral complexity
The original RoboCop actively avoids giving easy answers. By the time the credits roll, corporate overlord Dick Jones (Ronny Cox) has fallen, but the system still remains. Alex triumphs, but he’s still trapped inside a murder robot, forever alienated from his life’s purpose. The gun twirl he once amused his son with is the punctuation of the film, but even that reads more as a scathing acknowledgment of the cartoonish violence that a police state brings. Alex overcomes his programming, but the violent underbelly of the institutions he dedicated his life to protecting can’t be deterred by one man’s hero quest. That complexity is the heart of RoboCop, and that’s going to be what makes or breaks this attempt at reigniting the franchise.
Barring that, at least there’s bound to be some sick action sequences. Sign us up.
About the Author
